Commingling effect of gynoid and android fat patterns on cardiometabolic dysregulation in normal weight American adults.

AIM: To determine the independent and commingling effect of android and gynoid percent fat (measured using Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry) on cardiometabolic dysregulation in normal weight American adults. METHODS: The 2005-2006 data (n=1802) from the United States National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys (NHANES) were used in this study. Associations of android percent fat, gynoid percent fat and their joint occurrence with risks of cardiometabolic risk factors were estimated using prevalence odds ratios from logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Android-gynoid percent fat ratio was more highly correlated with cardiometabolic dysregulation than android percent fat, gynoid percent fat or body mass index. Commingling of android and gynoid adiposities was associated with much greater odds of cardiometabolic risk factors than either android or gynoid adiposities. Commingling of android and gynoid adiposities was associated with 1.75 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.42-2.93), 1.48 (95% CI=1.32-1.91), 1.61 (95% CI=1.50-1.89), 3.56 (95% CI=2.91-4.11) and 1.86 (95% CI=1.49-1.96) increased odds of elevated glucose, elevated blood pressure, elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, elevated triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Normal weight subjects who present with both android and gynoid adiposities should be advised of the associated health risks. Both android and gynoid fat accumulations should be considered in developing public health strategies for reducing cardiometabolic disease risk in normal weight subjects.

Regional fat localizations and racial/ethnic variations in odds of hypertension in at-risk American adults.

The objective of this study was to determine the contribution of regional fat localizations defined as abdominal (AO) or truncal (TO) obesity in racial/ethnic differences to the prevalence odds of hypertension in overweight American adults. Data (n=5,694) from the 1999-2002 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were utilized for this analysis. Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference >or=102 and >or=88 cm for men and women, respectively. Truncal obesity was defined using ratio of subscapular to triceps skinfold thickness and were >or=2.24 and >or=1.32, for men and women, respectively. Prevalence odds ratios from gender-specific logistic regression models were used to evaluate the contribution of regional fat localizations to racial/ethnic variation in hypertension. Statistical adjustment was made for age, education, alcohol intake and body mass index. In both men and women, coexistence of AO and TO was associated with much higher prevalence odds of hypertension than association due to each of the regional fat localizations. In men, coexistence of AO and TO was associated with 1.99, 2.47 and 2.10 increased prevalence odds of hypertension in Whites, Blacks and Mexican Americans, respectively. The corresponding values in women were 2.83, 4.07 and 3.61 in Whites, Blacks and Mexican Americans, respectively. The coexistence of AO and TO appears to be the culprit that contributes to high blood pressure on top of body mass index. Weight reduction programs that are targeted toward abdominal and truncal regions in at-risk populations and along racial/ethnic lines may help to alleviate racial/ethnic disparity in risk of hypertension.

Effects of screening and brief intervention training on resident and faculty alcohol intervention behaviours: a pre- post-intervention assessment.

BACKGROUND: Many hazardous and harmful drinkers do not receive clinician advice to reduce their drinking. Previous studies suggest under-detection and clinician reluctance to intervene despite awareness of problem drinking (PD). The Healthy Habits Project previously reported chart review data documenting increased screening and intervention with hazardous and harmful drinkers after training clinicians and implementing routine screening. This report describes the impact of the Healthy Habits training program on clinicians' rates of identification of PD, level of certainty in identifying PD and the proportion of patients given advice to reduce alcohol use, based on self-report data using clinician exit questionnaires. METHODS: 28 residents and 10 faculty in a family medicine residency clinic completed four cycles of clinician exit interview questionnaires before and after screening and intervention training. Rates of identifying PD, level of diagnostic certainty, and frequency of advice to reduce drinking were compared across intervention status (pre vs. post). Findings were compared with rates of PD and advice to reduce drinking documented on chart review. RESULTS: 1,052 clinician exit questionnaires were collected. There were no significant differences in rates of PD identified before and after intervention (9.8% vs. 7.4%, p = .308). Faculty demonstrated greater certainty in PD diagnoses than residents (p = .028) and gave more advice to reduce drinking (p = .042) throughout the program. Faculty and residents reported higher levels of diagnostic certainty after training (p = .039 and .030, respectively). After training, residents showed greater increases than faculty in the percentage of patients given advice to reduce drinking (p = .038), and patients felt to be problem drinkers were significantly more likely to receive advice to reduce drinking by all clinicians (50% vs. 75%, p = .047). The number of patients receiving advice to reduce drinking after program implementation exceeded the number of patients felt to be problem drinkers. Recognition rates of PD were four to eight times higher than rates documented on chart review (p = .028). CONCLUSION: This program resulted in greater clinician certainty in diagnosing PD and increases in the number of patients with PD who received advice to reduce drinking. Future programs should include booster training sessions and emphasize documentation of PD and brief intervention.

Poor health is associated with episodic heavy alcohol use: evidence from a National Survey.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between self-rated health and episodic heavy drinking in a representative sample of American adults. We also sought to determine ethnic and gender differences in the association between self-rated health and episodic heavy drinking. METHODS: Data (n=4649) from the Third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were utilized for this investigation. Episodic heavy drinking was defined as the consumption of five or more and four or more alcoholic beverages on one occasion for men and women, respectively. Poor health was defined as answering fair or poor to the question: "Would you say your health in general is excellent, very good, good, fair or poor?" Odds ratio from the logistic linear regression analysis was used to estimate the risk for poor health that was associated with episodic heavy drinking. Statistical adjustments were made for age, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, body mass index and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Overall, episodic heavy drinking was associated with increased odds of poor self-rated health in men and women. In men, episodic heavy drinking was independently associated with 1.28 (95% CI: 1.07-1.82) increased odds of poor health. The corresponding value in women was 1.86 (95% CI: 1.05-2.28). In men, being Black was associated with approximately two-fold (OR=1.96; 95% CI: 1.33, 2.89), and being Hispanic was associated with approximately four-fold (OR=3.59; 95% CI: 2.50, 5.14) increased odds of poor self-rated health relative to being White. The corresponding odds ratios in women were 2.97 (95% CI: 1.90, 4.64) and 5.18 (95% CI: 3.23, 8.30). Associations were greater among blacks (adjusted OR=2.41; 95% CI: 1.81-3.22) and Hispanics (adjusted OR=4.15; 95% CI: 3.12-5.52) than among whites. CONCLUSIONS: Poor health is associated with episodic heavy alcohol consumption. Public health strategies to curb alcohol abuse may improve self-reported health status in these at-risk populations.

Racial/ethnic differences in prehypertension in American adults: population and relative attributable risks of abdominal obesity.

To estimate the risk and population attributable risk of prehypertension that is due to abdominal obesity in White, Black and Hispanic American adults. To determine how much of the relative difference in the risk of prehypertension between high-risk Blacks and Hispanics and the low-risk group Whites that is attributable to their differences in abdominal obesity. Data (n=4016) from the 1999 to 2000 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were used in this study. Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference >/=102 and >/=88 cm in men and women, respectively. Prehypertension was defined as not being on antihypertensive medication and having systolic blood pressure of 120-139 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of 80-89 mmHg. Odds ratio from the logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the risk of prehypertension that was due to abdominal obesity. To estimate prehypertension risk differences between low-risk Whites and high-risk Blacks and Hispanics that was due to abdominal obesity, we estimated relative attributable risk. Statistical adjustments were made for age, blood glucose, total cholesterol, current smoking and exercise. Abdominal obesity was associated with increased odds of prehypertension in Whites, Blacks and Hispanics. In men, abdominal obesity was associated with 44, 90 and 98% increased odds of prehypertension in Whites, Blacks and Hispanics, respectively. The corresponding values in women were 112, 198 and 104%. Proportions of risk of prehypertension explained by abdominal obesity were 15.2, 22 and 25.8% in White men, Black men and Hispanic men, respectively. The corresponding values in women were 38.8, 58.6 and 32.5%. Approximately, 7% of the differences in the risk of developing prehypertension between White and Black men and between White and Hispanic men may be attributable to differences in rates of abdominal obesity. The analogous values for women were approximately 39.7 and approximately 16.5%, respectively. In conclusion, despite having lower rates of abdominal obesity than their counterparts, Black men, Hispanic men and Hispanic women had high population attributable risks, indicating that factors other than abdominal obesity may have important explanatory power for racial differences in prehypertension in these groups. However, in Black women reduction in risk of prehypertension could be possible by instituting public health measures to reduce abdominal obesity to the levels seen in White women. Intervention programmes designed to reduce overall obesity may also lead to reduction of abdominal obesity, and consequently may curb prehypertension in these population groups. Life-style modification, including diet and exercise, may have public health significance in reducing the incidence of prehypertension in these populations.

Low birth weight is associated with elevated serum lipoprotein(a) in white and black American children ages 5-11 y.

Nutritional insults experienced by the mother have a life-long imprint on organ size and function of the fetus. Infant low birth weight (LBW) is one of the consequences of such maternal undernutrition. The physiological consequences of nutritional insults can lead to adverse metabolic consequences after birth, including hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia. The objective of this study was to determine the association and contribution of LBW to serum concentration of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in a representative sample of white and black American children aged 5-11 y. Data (n=666) from the Third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used in this investigation. Racial/ethnic-specific trends in mean values of Lp(a) were compared across tertile distribution of birth weight. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to determine the association of birth weight with Lp(a), controlling for age, sex and sum of four skinfold thicknesses (SUM). A consistent trend of increasing values of Lp(a) with decreasing birth weight emerged for both white and black children (P<0.001). Black children presented with higher values of serum concentrations of Lp(a) at each level of birth weight distributions than white children (P<0.01). Black race/ethnicity was associated with approximately 0.4 mg/dl greater serum concentration of Lp(a) than white, adjusting for birth weight, age, sex and SUM (P<0.001). LBW sub-population in black children appeared to be relevant to elevated Lp(a) concentration, while a similar scenario did not appear in white children. Since interactions between in utero factors and risk exposures after birth are likely, definitive studies evaluating these interactions are warranted.

Racial differences in rates of type 2 diabetes in American women: how much is due to differences in overall adiposity?

BACKGROUND: Although the rates of type 2 diabetes attributable to obesity have been documented by numerous studies, little attention has been paid to an important question of, "what fraction of the differences in rates of diabetes between high-risk and low-risk women is due to their differences in prevalence of obesity? This study aimed, therefore, to determine how much of the relative difference in the rates of type 2 diabetes between high-risk non-Hispanic Black and low-risk non-Hispanic White American women can be attributed to differences in overall adiposity. METHODS: Data (n = 1,222) from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-94) was used in this investigation. Obesity was defined as body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or more. Estimates of population attributable risks and relative attributable risks were derived using multiple logistic regression models, adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol intake. RESULTS: There were within and between population differences in the impact of obesity on diabetes. The impact of obesity on diabetes as measured by odds ratio and population attributable risk was greater for White women compared to Black women. Obesity was independently associated with a 4-fold (OR = 4.43; 95% CI: 2.65, 7.44) and almost a 2-fold (OR = 1.85; 95% CI: 0.99, 3.47) increased risks of diabetes for White and Black women, respectively. Being Black was associated with an almost 2-fold (OR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.82) increased risk of diabetes relative to White. The population attributable risks of diabetes due to obesity were 49.9% and 28% in Whites and Blacks, respectively. Over one-third (39%) of the difference in rates of diabetes between Black and White women was attributable to differences in the prevalence of overall obesity, adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The result of this study indicating that obesity is a significant factor in explaining the higher prevalence of diabetes among Black women has public health relevance. Since obesity is a preventable and an avoidable risk factor for type 2 diabetes in all populations, the result of this investigation presents a compelling reason to emphasize public health measures to educate women on the need to reduce weight, particularly the high-risk black American women.

Hypertension and type 2 diabetes comorbidity in adults in the United States: risk of overall and regional adiposity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of generalized, abdominal, and truncal fat deposits on the risk of hypertension and/or diabetes and to determine whether ethnic differences in these fat patterns are independently associated with increased risk for the hypertension-diabetes comorbidity (HDC). RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Data (n = 7075) from the Third U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used for this investigation. To assess risks of hypertension and/or diabetes that were due to different fat patterns, odds ratios of men and women with various cut-points of adiposities were compared with normal subjects in logistic regression models, adjusting for age, smoking, and alcohol intake. To evaluate the contribution of ethnic differences in obesity to the risks of HDC, we compared blacks and Hispanics with whites. RESULTS: Generalized and abdominal obesities were independently associated with increased risk of hypertension, diabetes and HDC in white, black, and Hispanic men and women. The risk of HDC due to generalized, truncal, and abdominal obesities tended to be higher in whites than blacks and Hispanics. In men, the contribution of black and Hispanic ethnicities to the increased risk of HDC due to the various obesity phenotypes was approximately 73% and approximately 61%, respectively. The corresponding values for black and Hispanic women were approximately 115% and approximately 125%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to advocating behavioral lifestyles to curb the epidemic of obesity among at-risk populations in the United States, there is also the need for primary health care practitioners to craft their advice to the degree and type of obesity in these at-risk groups.

Apolipoprotein B, ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-C, and blood pressure in abdominally obese white and black American women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the association of apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TC/HDL) with blood pressure in abdominally obese white and black American women. We also sought to determine if there are ethnic differences in blood pressure values that could be explained by differences in mean values of ApoB and TC/HDL. METHODS: Data (n = 1844) from the Third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used in this study. Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference (WC) of > or =88cm or having WC greater than what was expected as predicted from residuals obtained from linear regression of WC on BMI. Bi-variate Pearson's correlation analysis was used to quantify the degree of association of ApoB and TC/HDL with blood pressure and other lipids. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the independent contribution of ApoB and TC/HDL to blood pressure, adjusting for age, total cholesterol, alcohol intake, and smoking. To determine ethnic differences in blood pressure values associated with ApoB or TC/HDL, dummy variables were used to compare blacks with whites fitted in multiple regression models, while adjusting for age, total cholesterol, alcohol intake and smoking. RESULTS: Elevated ApoB was positively associated with diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP/SBP) in blacks and whites, independent of age, total cholesterol, alcohol intake and smoking (P < 0.01). Elevated TC/HDL was also positively associated with increased DBP and SBP in whites (P < 0.05). For the same value of ApoB and TC/HDL whites had higher values of DBP and SBP than blacks, adjusting for confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TC/HDL, ApoB was more strongly associated with DBP and SBP in both abdominally obese white and black women. Since ApoB is associated with hypertension, the combination of elevated ApoB and hypertension may identify a group of patients with more marked risk of vascular disease, thus, warranting further investigation.

Abdominal obesity defined as a larger than expected waist girth is associated with racial/ethnic differences in risk of hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Waist circumference (WC) cut-points of > or =102 cm and > or =88 cm for men and women, respectively, representing abdominal obesity have been recommended for determining obesity related co-morbidities. However, these cut-points carry the component of generalised obesity estimated by body mass index (BMI). The aim of this investigation was to determine whether abdominal obesity free of the influence of overall heaviness is associated with increased risk of hypertension in a representative sample of white and black Americans. METHODS: Data (n = 11114) from the Third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used in this investigation. Standardised residual values from the linear regression of WC on BMI were used to define abdominal obesity status. The risk of hypertension associated with abdominal obesity was estimated from the logistic regression model, adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol. We also estimated the public health consequences of abdominal obesity from the population attributable fraction of hypertension. RESULTS: Relative to white, black race/ethnicity was associated with approximately 1.8 and approximately 2.7 greater risk of hypertension in men and women, respectively, adjusting for abdominal obesity, age, smoking and alcohol consumption. Having larger than expected waist girths were associated with 1.58 and 1.39 increased risk of hypertension in black men and black women, respectively, adjusting for confounders. Population attributable risks of hypertension due to abdominal obesity were approximately 24.9% and 15.9%, in black men and black women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Americans, hypertension is a public health problem that is closely linked to abdominal adiposity. An important research challenge therefore is to determine the best way to regulate body weight under conditions of food abundance. There is a need to clarify how lifestyle habits promote large waist sizes leading to abdominal adiposity and associated cardiovascular disease in the US, particularly among black Americans.

Obesity is associated with reduced self-rated general health status: evidence from a representative sample of white, black, and Hispanic Americans.

BACKGROUND: Although the evidence linking obesity with many chronic diseases is well established, the relationship with self-rated health is not clear. Self-rating of health is a broad summary measure of different domains of health that include psychosocial domain. The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between obesity and self-rated health and the degree of agreement between patients' self-rated health status and physicians' impression of patients' health in a representative sample of healthy noninstitutionalized American adults. METHODS: Data (n = 10, 298) used for this analysis were obtained from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Normal weight was defined as BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2) and preobesity was defined as BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2). Moderate (class I) obesity was defined as BMI 30-34.9 kg/m(2) and severe (class II) obesity as BMI > or =35 kg/m(2). Self-rated health conditions were categorized as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor. Agreement between physicians' impression and self-rated health and a linear relationship between obesity and individual perceived health were quantified using kappa and gamma statistics, respectively. Using the logistic regression analysis, odds of reporting reduced health in preobese, class I obese, and class II obese individuals were compared with those for normal-weight individuals, adjusting for age, current smoking, and alcohol intake. The contribution of obesity to ethnic differences in reduced self-rated health was determined by comparing blacks with whites and Hispanics with whites fitted in multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among both men and women, there was a statistically significant linear association between obesity and self-rated health (P < 0.05). The proportion of subjects reporting excellent health tended to decrease with increasing level of obesity in the three ethnic groups. In the three ethnic groups, the degrees of concordance between self-rated health and physicians' impressions were poor and decreased with increasing obesity level. In each ethnic group, class II obesity was associated with approximately twofold increased odds of reporting reduced health compared with normal-weight individuals. Compared to whites, black and Hispanic races/ethnicities were respectively associated with 23 and 175% increased odds of reduced self-rated health among men. The corresponding values for women were 45 and 177%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide evidence that obesity has a negative impact on self-rated health among adults, even in the absence of chronic disease conditions. The results of this investigation also underscore the need to craft national preventive strategies to curb obesity in these at-risk population groups.

Verbal autopsy: a necessary solution for the paucity of mortality data in the less-developed countries.

Although global disease burden can best be described using accurate and reliable mortality data, many investigators rely solely on death certificates, despite the fact that many of the less-developed countries (LDCs) do not have mandated death certifications. In many of these LDCs, particularly in remote areas, verbal autopsy (VA) may be a surrogate for death certificates in ascertaining causes of death. The main benefit of using VA stems from the fact that it is based on laypersons' observations of the diseased, and therefore does not require medical training. Because of human and economic resource constraints in many LDCs, investments in infrastructures for collecting mortality data needed for the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of health are unlikely in the immediate future. Investment in rural health workers who are trained in VA may prove useful in increasing the quality and availability of mortality data from many LDCs. Rural health workers are essentially 'foot doctors' in many of these countries, whose familiarity with nooks and crannies of villages would be beneficial in the collection of needed mortality data. There is a need for international development agencies, such as the World Health Organization, to devote resources for training rural health workers in order to increase the availability of mortality data for describing worldwide disease burdens.

Abdominal adiposity values associated with established body mass indexes in white, black and hispanic Americans. A study from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

PURPOSE: To determine whether white, black and hispanic young (17-39y) and middle-aged (40-59y) adults, and elderly (60-90y) Americans have the same values of abdominal adiposity (estimated from waist circumference (WC) at the established levels of overweight (body mass index, BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2). METHODS: Data (n=16,120) from the US Third National Health and Nutrition Survey were utilized. Age-adjusted linear regression analyses were used to estimate gender- and ethnic-specific WC values corresponding to overweight and obesity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also employed to determine the choices of WC values corresponding to the established BMI cut-off points. With ROC, gender- and ethnic-specific cut-off points producing the best combination of sensitivity and specificity were selected as optimal thresholds for WC values corresponding to the established BMI cut-off points. RESULTS: WC values associated with the established BMI were lower in blacks and hispanics compared with whites. In men, the WC values that corresponded to overweight ranged from 89 to 106 cm, from 84 to 95 cm, and from 87 to 97 cm in whites, blacks and hispanics, respectively. The corresponding values for obesity ranged from 99 to 110 cm, from 96 to 107 cm, and from 97 to 108 cm. The WC values that corresponded to overweight in women ranged from 82 to 91 cm, from 81 in to 90 cm, and from 83 to 92 cm in whites, blacks and hispanics, respectively. The analogous values for obesity ranged from 94 to 101 cm, from 93 to 100cm, and from 94 to 101 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of higher WC values in blacks (particularly women) and hispanics at the same levels of BMI for whites challenges previously held assumptions regarding the role of abdominal adiposity in cardiovascular disease experienced by non-whites. Defining the anthropometric variables that satisfactorily describe reasons for ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease is one of the challenges for future research.

Abdominal adiposity and clustering of multiple metabolic syndrome in White, Black and Hispanic americans.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of abdominal adiposity assessed by waist circumference (WC) with clustering of multiple metabolic syndromes (MMS) in White, Black and Hispanic Americans. MMS was defined as the occurrence of two or more of either hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia or hyperinsulinemia. METHODS: The number of MMS and fasting insulin (a surrogate measure of MMS) were each used as dependent variables in gender-specific multiple linear regression models, adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol intake. The contribution of WC to interethnic differences in clustering of MMS and fasting insulin concentration was assessed in gender-specific linear regression models. The risk of MMS due to large waist was estimated by comparing odds ratio for men with WC >/= 102 cm with those with WC < 102, and women with WC >/= 88 cm with women with WC < 88 cm in the logistic regression model adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol intake. RESULTS: WC was positively and independently associated with clustering of MMS and increased fasting insulin concentration adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol intake in the three ethnic groups (p < 0.01). Black ethnicity was associated with clustering of MMS and fasting insulin concentration (p < 0.01). Hispanic ethnicity was also associated with clustering of MMS in men and associated with fasting insulin concentration in both men and women (p < 0.01). In both men and women, the risk of MMS clustering was strongly associated with increased WC in all ethnic groups independent of BMI. CONCLUSION: WC appears to be a marker for multiple metabolic syndromes in these ethnic groups. The results of this investigation lend support to the view that waist measurement should be considered as a clinical variable for assessing the risk of cardiovascular diseases.

Impact of birth weight on ethnic variations in subcutaneous and central adiposity in American children aged 5-11 years. A study from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the types of subcutaneous adiposity represented by different measurements of skinfold thickness that are associated with birth weight in white (n=759), Black (n=916) and Hispanic (n=813) American children aged 5-11 y. We also determined the contribution of birth weight to ethnic differences in subcutaneous and central adiposity. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data for this analysis were from the Third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The outcome measures were triceps, subscapular, suprailiac and thigh skinfold thicknesses at 5-11 y of age. Central adiposity was defined as ratios of subscapular to triceps (STR) and central-peripheral (CPR) (subscapular+suprailiac)/(triceps+thigh) skinfolds. Partial correlation analyses were used to determine the association between birth weight and measures of subcutaneous fatness, while multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the independent contribution of birth weight to ethnicity variations in subcutaneous and central adiposity adjusting for sex, age and BMI. RESULTS: Overall, birth weight was negatively associated with subscapular skinfold and central adiposity in White, Black and Hispanic American children (P < 0.05). Birth weight was also negatively associated with suprailliac skinfold in both Blacks and Hispanics (P < 0.01) and with sum of the four skinfolds in Blacks (P < 0.05). Compared with White, Black ethnicity was negatively associated with triceps, suprailliac thigh and sum of skinfold thicknesses controlling for birth weight, sex, age and BMI (P < 0.01). Compared with White, Hispanic ethnicity was negatively associated with triceps, thigh and sum of skinfold thicknesses (P < 0.01). Both Black and Hispanic ethnicity was positively associated with STR and CPR (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of American children, the association of birth weights with subcutaneous and central fat accumulation may be due to fetal programming. Since the impact of fetal conditions is likely to be modified by life course, defining the interaction between factors that are present at birth and subsequent exposures is one of the essential challenges for future research.

Predictive values of waist circumference for dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes and hypertension in overweight White, Black, and Hispanic American adults.

Waist circumferences (WC) >/=102 cm for men and >/=88 cm for women have been proposed by an expert panel as cut-points for identifying increased risk for the development of obesity comorbidities for most adults. The aim of this investigation was to examine the predictive values of these WC cut-points for hypercholesterolemia, low concentration of high (HDL-C), and high concentration of low (LDL-C) density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension in overweight American adults. Data from NHANES III were utilized for the analysis. Predictive abilities were determined by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive (PV+) and negative (PV-) predictive values in overweight subjects with BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2). Sensitivity of WC cut-point was stronger for high LDL-C compared to other risk factors with the highest values recorded in the 40-59 and 60-69 year age groups in men and women, respectively. PV+ of WC cut-points for dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension were low in men compared to women. PV+ tended to increase with age, from 19-39, 40-59 to 60-90 year age groups in Whites, Blacks, and Hispanic men. In men, the highest PV+ were recorded for hypertriglyceridemia in the 60-90 years old groups, with values of 71.6%, 52.5%, and 43.3% in Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics, respectively. The CVD risk factor associated with the highest PV+ in women was diabetes with values of 97.2% in Whites and 88.9% in Blacks, and hypertriglyceridemia with a value of 93.8% in the 17-39 year age group in Hispanics. Among Black men 40-59 years of age, only 32% of a population of overweight hypertensives were detected by the WC cut-points, and among Black women, 40-59 years of age, only 54% were detected. Given the low sensitivity of these cut-points for detecting hypertension, one of the major co-morbidities of obesity, these cut-points failed to provide adequate evidence for the use of WC in determining or evaluating patients as to co-morbid states. We recommend further studies to determine a set of specific cut-points associated with increased risk of CVD in different population groups.

Ethnic differences in the rates of low birth weight attributable to differences in early motherhood: a study from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of early motherhood (being a mother at < 20 years of age) on ethnic differences in the risk of low birth weight (LBW) in a representative sample (n = 9141) of American infants and children. METHODS: Risks for LBW and the population-attributable fraction due to early motherhood were estimated adjusting for maternal smoking and education in logistic regression models. The contribution of early motherhood to ethnic differences in the risks of LBW was determined using a relative attributable risk estimate that compared Hispanics and Blacks with Whites. RESULTS: Early motherhood was independently associated with increased risk of LBW in each of the three ethnic groups, adjusting for maternal smoking during pregnancy and education. Hispanic and Black ethnicity were each associated with 15% and 123% increased risk of LBW relative to Whites. The population-attributable fractions of LBW due to early motherhood were 6.2%, 7.4%, and 2.3%, for Whites, Hispanics, and Blacks, respectively. The responses of early motherhood for LBW were different among the three ethnic groups (p < 0.05). Adjusting for maternal smoking and education, 4.8% and 7.4% of the differences in the risk of LBW between Whites and Hispanics and between Whites and Blacks, respectively, were due to differences in early motherhood. CONCLUSION: The result of this study underscores the risk of LBW due to early motherhood. Because early motherhood is preventable and avoidable, appropriate public health strategies to educate young women on the need to delay childbearing in these ethnic groups, particularly among Hispanics and Blacks, are warranted.

Predictive value of abdominal obesity cut-off points for hypertension in blacks from west African and Caribbean island nations.

BACKGROUND: Waist circumferences (WC) >/=94 cm for men and >/=80 cm for women (action level I) and >/=102 cm for men and >/=88 cm for women (action level II) have been suggested as limits for health promotion purposes to alert the general public to the need for weight loss. In this analysis we examined the ability of the above cut-off points to correctly identify subjects with or without hypertension in Nigeria, Cameroon, Jamaica, St Lucia and Barbados. We also determined population- and gender-specific abdominal adiposity cut-off points for epidemiological identification of risk of hypertension. METHODS: Waist measurement was made at the narrowest part of the torso as seen from the front or at midpoint between the bottom of the rib cage and 2 cm above the top of the iliac crest. Sensitivity and specificity of the established WC cut-off points for hypertension were compared across sites. With receiver operating characteristics (ROC), population- and gender-specific cut-off points associated with risk of hypertension were determined over the entire range of WC values. RESULTS: Predictive abilities of the established WC cut-off points for hypertension were poor compared to the specific cut-off points estimated for each population. Different values of WC were associated with increased risk of hypertension in these populations. In men, WC cut-off points of 76, 81, 80, 83 and 87 cm provided the highest sensitivity for identifying hypertensives in Nigeria, Cameroon, Jamaica, St Lucia and Barbados, respectively. The analogous cut-off points in women were 72, 82, 85, 86 and 88 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The waist cut-off points from this study represent values for epidemiological identification of risk of hypertension. For the purpose of health promotion, the decision on what cut-off points to use must be made by considering other additional factors including overall impact on health due to intervention (e.g. weight reduction) and potential burden on health services if a low cut-off point is employed. There is a need to develop abdominal adiposity cut-off points associated with increased risks for cardiovascular diseases in different societies, especially for those populations where the distribution of obesity and associated risk factors tends to be very different from those of the technologically advanced nations. International Journal of Obesity (2000) 24, 180-186

Ethnic differences in the risk of type 2 diabetes attributable to differences in abdominal adiposity in American women.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how much of the relative difference in the risk of type 2 diabetes between White and non-White (Black and Hispanic) American women can be explained by differences in the prevalence of abdominal obesity. METHODS: Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 1572) were used in this investigation. The risk of type 2 diabetes and the population attributable fraction due to abdominal obesity were estimated using a logistic regression model adjusted for body mass index, age, smoking and alcohol consumption. The contribution of abdominal obesity to the development of diabetes within different ethnic groups and ethnic differences in the risk of diabetes were determined using the population attributable fraction and relative attributable risk, respectively, which compared Hispanic and Black women to White women. RESULTS: Abdominal obesity was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes when adjusting for body mass index, age, smoking and alcohol consumption. The population attributable fractions indicated that 24.0, 39.9 and 15.7% of diabetes in White, Black and Hispanic women, respectively, could have been avoided if abdominal obesity was absent. Abdominal obesity accounted for 12.1% and 9.8% of ethnic differences in the risk of diabetes between White and Black women and between White and Hispanic women, respectively. CONCLUSION: A reduction in the risk of diabetes among Black and Hispanic women could be possible by instituting public health measures for reducing waist size to the levels seen in White women. Intervention programmes designed for reducing overall obesity and, consequently, waist size through lifestyle modification, including exercise and diet, may have considerable public health significance in reducing the incidence of type 2 diabetes in these populations.

Abdominal adiposity in six populations of West African descent: prevalence and population attributable fraction of hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this investigation was to examine the prevalence of abdominal adiposity and its association with the prevalence of hypertension among African descent populations in Nigeria, Cameroon, Jamaica, St. Lucia, Barbados, and the United States (US). RESEARCH METHOD: The data for this investigation were obtained from the International Collaborative Study on Hypertension in Blacks. Hypertension was defined as mean diastolic blood pressure > or =90 mmHg, systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mmHg or current treatment with prescribed anti-hypertension medication. Abdominal overweight was defined as waist circumference (WC) > or =94 and > or =80 cm for men and women, respectively. Abdominal obesity was defined as WC > or =102 and > or =88 cm for men and women, respectively. We estimated the site-specific prevalence of abdominal overweight and obesity across age and body mass index cut-points. We also calculated the population attributable fraction (AF) of hypertension due to abdominal adiposity. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypertension in these populations was tightly linked to abdominal adiposity. Increases in abdominal overweight accompanied an increasing degree of Westernization, rising from 6.4% and 26.3% in Nigeria, 16.5% and 62.8% in Cameroon, 15.8% and 58.6% in Jamaica, 14.3% and 62.1% in St. Lucia, 21.4% and 70.3% in Barbados to 38.9%, and 76.4% in the US for men and women, respectively. The corresponding values for abdominal obesity were 1.6% and 12.3% in Nigeria, 5.1% and 38.9% in Cameroon, 5.5% and 34.0% in Jamaica, 2.7% and 40.7% in St. Lucia, 7.8% and 44.7% in Barbados to 21.7% and 54.1% in the US for men and women, respectively. Body mass index-adjusted estimates of AF suggest that in most of these populations, especially in females, avoidance of abdominal overweight or obesity would help to curb the development of hypertension. DISCUSSION: An important public health challenge is to clarify how lifestyle factors influence risks of abdominal adiposity and ultimately the increased risk of cardiovascular diseases.